PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Marketing Intelligence & Planning4 citations

Who is behind the eco-label? Certification source, trust in government and their impact on consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium

View Full Paper
NSNaman SreenCBChinmoy Bandyopadhyay

Key Points

  • This research aims to understand how the source of eco-labels and trust in government affect consumer perceptions and willingness to pay more for eco-labeled products.
  • Employed a between-subjects factorial experimental design.
  • Investigated the influence of government versus private eco-label sources.
  • Assessed consumer perceptions of credibility, quality, and expensiveness.
  • Examined the moderating role of government trust on these perceptions.
  • No significant difference in perceptions of credibility, quality, and expensiveness between government and private eco-label sources at a 95% confidence interval.
  • Perceptions of expensiveness were lower for government eco-labels compared to private at a 90% confidence interval.
  • Quality perceptions showed a positive association with willingness to pay a premium.
  • High trust in government strengthened the relationship between government eco-labels and consumer perceptions of credibility and quality.

Abstract

Purpose Over recent decades, organizations have increasingly adopted eco-labels to signal their products' sustainability and ethical attributes. While this proliferation reflects consumer demand and institutional pressures, it has also raised concerns about how eco-labels are perceived in terms of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions influence willingness to pay a premium. This study further examines whether such perceptions depend on receiver's trust in the government. Hence, this study integrates signaling theory and the elaboration likelihood model to answer how source-related signals (government vs private labels) interact with receiver-related information processing (trust in government) to influence consumer perceptions and willingness to pay a premium. Design/methodology/approach This study employs a between-subjects factorial experimental design to investigate the influence of eco-label source, government versus private certification, on consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness, and how these perceptions subsequently shape willingness to pay a premium for eco-labeled products. Furthermore, this study checks the moderating role of trust in government for the relationship between eco-label sources (government and private) and consumer perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness. Findings The findings of the study indicate that the perceptions of credibility, quality and expensiveness do not significantly differ for the two eco-label sources (government and private) at a 95% confidence interval. Still, perceptions of expensiveness vary at a 90% confidence interval, such that a product with a government eco-label is perceived to be less expensive than a private eco-labeled product. Among the three consumer perceptions, only quality demonstrates a significant positive association with willingness to pay a premium. Furthermore, the inclusion of the moderator, trust in government, alters these relationships: under conditions of high trust in government, the associations between government eco-label and credibility, as well as between government eco-label and quality, become significant. Originality/value The study demonstrates that both the source of eco-labels (government vs private) and trust in government shape consumer perceptions of eco-labeled products, which in turn influence their willingness to pay a premium. The key finding is that government eco-labels are not always superior to private certifications, except under conditions of high institutional trust. The study provides practical insights and theoretical contributions by extending the body of knowledge on eco-label credibility, consumer evaluations, trust in institutions and sustainable consumption.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Sreen et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6973106cc8125b09b0d20294https://doi.org/10.1108/mip-03-2025-0268
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Going green, paying more: the relationship between trust in green labeling, green perceived value and price premiums2025
  2. 2Effects of Eco-Labels and Perceived Influencer Expertise on Perceived Healthfulness, Perceived Product Quality, and Behavioral Intention2024 · 19 citations
  3. 3Do consumers prefer a climate or eco label on food? The role of understanding, attitudes, and trust2026
  4. 4Will eco-labels as a communication strategy for ecological information cause consumers to buy green products? Evidence from China2026
  5. 5Beyond the label: unpacking consumer responses to eco-friendly claims2026