The article examines how AI affects state responsibility in international law, indicating a need for legal adaptation.
This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence on the doctrine of state responsibility in international law. As algorithmic systems increasingly shape decision-making processes traditionally governed by human judgment, fundamental assumptions regarding attribution, intent, and control are being challenged. The study adopts a doctrinal and analytical approach to assess whether existing international legal frameworks are capable of addressing the complexities introduced by autonomous and semi-autonomous artificial intelligence systems. By analyzing the principles of attribution and fault under international law, the article argues that while current doctrines provide a foundational framework, they remain insufficient to fully account for algorithm-driven conduct. The article concludes by emphasizing the need for an adaptive interpretation of state responsibility to ensure legal accountability in the age of artificial intelligence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tuğba Tosun Çobanoğlu (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: