PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Journal of Public Affairs1 citations

Local Institutions and Forest Conservation Outcomes in the Indian State of Odisha: A Comparative Analysis of the Performance of Joint Forest Management and Community Forest Management

View Full Paper
RMRupesh Kumar MoharanaSSSwadhina Shikha SwainBBBhagirath Behera

Key Points

  • The study aims to compare the effectiveness of community forest management and joint forest management in promoting forest growth.
  • Analyzed primary and secondary data from 40 randomly selected forest community institutions.
  • Used an ordered logit model to assess differences in forest conservation outcomes.
  • Compared performance between 20 CFM and 20 JFM communities.
  • CFM communities demonstrated better performance in forest growth than JFM communities.
  • Larger community size and resource scarcity correlate with effective forest management.
  • Construction of roads negatively impacted forest growth.
  • Better performance was also linked to the distance from forest department offices.

Abstract

ABSTRACT This study assesses the performance of two competing local institutions like community forest management (CFM) and joint forest management (JFM) on the ecological outcome (forest growth) in the Keonjhar district of the Indian state of Odisha. Specifically, the present study attempts to undertake a comparative analysis of the performance of JFM and CFM and assess their effects on forest conservation outcomes. Primary and secondary data have been used to analyze the determinants of differences in forest conservation outcomes. The primary data from 40 randomly selected sampled forest community institutions (20 each from CFM and JFM communities) are analyzed using an ordered logit model. The results indicate that the CFM communities seem to be performing well compared to their counterpart JFM communities concerning forest growth. In addition, local communities are more effectively managing forests as their size is larger and the resources available are scarce. The construction of roads to improve transport and communication has a detrimental impact on forest growth. The presence of temple land and community located far away from the forest department office are also likely to promote better forest growth. Forest protection committees formed by the local communities are more likely to manage forests effectively than those formed by the forest department. Hence, the more degraded reserved forest may be allotted to well‐organized self‐initiated CFM communities to achieve both forest conservation objectives and promote local livelihoods.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moharana et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69731089c8125b09b0d203aahttps://doi.org/10.1002/pa.70110
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Governing the Commons: exploring contrasting institutional structures for community-based forest management in Bangladesh2025
  2. 2Outcomes of Community-Based Forest Management for Biodiversity Conservation in Northwest Ethiopia2025 · 7 citations
  3. 3Evaluating mangrove community forestry outcomes: a mixed synthetic control and field-based approach2024 · 1 citations
  4. 4Evaluating Community Forest User Groups (CFUGs)’ Performance in Managing Community Forests: A Case Study in Central Nepal2024 · 9 citations
  5. 5Community Forest Management in Northern Cameroon: Effectiveness on Water Resources Conservation2000