PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 23, 2026Seismological Research Letters2 citations

Coseismic Rupture and Aftershock Migration Governed by Multiple Fault Geometries: The 2022 Mw 6.6 Menyuan Earthquake

View Full Paper
JLJun LiLFLihua FANGLZL. X. Zhang

Key Points

  • Investigate how various fault geometries affect coseismic and postseismic behaviors during the Menyuan earthquake.
  • Analyzed a high-resolution seismic catalog of approximately 4200 events.
  • Utilized an Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar-derived coseismic slip model.
  • Examined interactions among multiple fault geometries in the strike-slip fault system.
  • Identified a 5 km aftershock gap linked to changes in fault strike and dip.
  • Coseismic surface rupture propagated across a 2.5 km stepover but was halted by the aftershock gap.
  • Localized peak slip measured approximately 3.5 m, significantly higher than typical values for equivalent magnitude events.

Abstract

Abstract Multiple fault geometries, including stepovers and variations in strike and dip angles, play a crucial role in controlling seismic processes. Previous studies have examined individual geometric factors, but integrated analyses of how they jointly govern seismic sequences remain limited. The 2022 Mw 6.6 Menyuan earthquake, located within a complex strike-slip fault system in the northeastern Tibetan Plateau, presents a valuable case study. Here, we combine a high-resolution seismic catalog (∼4200 events) with an Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar-derived coseismic slip model to elucidate these controls. Our results reveal a multigeometry fault system involving the Tuolaishan fault and the Lenglongling fault, characterized by distinct fault discontinuity features such as fault stepovers, bends, and variations in strike and dip. We observe an aftershock gap of ∼5 km at the fault bend, for which the fault’s strike and dip change by ∼10° to 14°. We demonstrate that these interacting geometries played a dominant role in the coseismic and postseismic process: the coseismic surface rupture successfully propagated across a ∼2.5 km stepover but was arrested by the aftershock gap. Meanwhile, the multiple geometries acted as stress concentrators, which likely localized the peak slip to ∼3.5 m—an anomalously high value, 2–3 times larger than typical for an Mw 6.6 event. Postseismically, the aftershocks evolved as two independent fronts separated by the variations in strike and dip (fault bend). The detection of repeating earthquakes and the observed “W-shaped” logarithmic migration pattern indicates that aseismic slip and fault discontinuities collectively dominate the path of aftershock expansion. These findings highlight that multiple geometries act as both rupture barriers and stress amplifiers, significantly elevating local seismic hazards.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697310b0c8125b09b0d204d7https://doi.org/10.1785/0220250355
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper