Short- and long-term ecological risk assessment of phthalate esters in freshwater and sediment highlights significant risks.
Phthalate esters (PAEs) are typical industrial and agricultural chemicals that are readily released into the environment. Due to their endocrine-disrupting properties, PAEs pose considerable ecological risks in different environmental matrices. However, current standards for evaluating ecological risks of PAEs focus primarily on environmental quality thresholds and do not account for criteria based on native species. This study integrated the species sensitivity distribution (SSD) modeling, interspecies correlation estimation (ICE), and acute-chronic ratio (ACR) calculations using toxicity data for 7 representative PAEs (dimethyl phthalate [DMP], diethyl phthalate [DEP], dibutyl phthalate [DnBP], butyl benzyl phthalate [BBP], dis (2-ethylhexyl) phthalate [DEHP], diisodecyl phthalate [DIDP], and dihexyl phthalate [DnHP]) from native species in freshwater. Short- and long-term predicted no-effect concentrations (PNECs) were estimated and applied to the ecological risk assessment (ERA) for these PAEs in freshwater and sediment across major basins of China. The PNECs for DIDP and DnHP were derived for the first time. The values of PNECs for the remaining PAEs were generally lower than previously reported value. The freshwater ERA results indicated a consistent risk ranking of DEHP > DnBP > BBP > DEP > DMP (DnHP) for both acute and chronic exposure. For sediment, the short- and long-term risk rankings differed, with acute risks following DnBP > DEP (DMP) > DEHP > BBP > DnHP, and chronic risks following DEHP > DnBP > DEP > DMP > BBP > DnHP. The DEHP should be warranted particular concern in sediments, as its ecological risk increased over time.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: