PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Bulletin de Philosophie Médiévale0 citations

Durand de Saint Pourçain, critique du clair-obscur cosmo-théologique

View Full Paper
GGGuy Guldentops

Key Points

  • Examine Durand of St. Pourçain's critique of the idea that evils contribute to the universe's perfection.
  • Analysis of Durand's philosophical arguments
  • Comparison with Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome
  • Evaluation of critiques from Peter of Palud, Diego Ruiz de Montoya, and Claude Frassen
  • Argues that evils do not enhance the goodness of the universe
  • Suggests that apparent goodness only seems elevated by evil
  • Critiques reveal significant theological tensions among scholastic thinkers

Abstract

Abstract Durand of St. Pourçain is one of the few scholastics who criticize the idea that evils really contribute to the perfection of the universe. In contrast with Thomas Aquinas and Giles of Rome, he points out that evils, when placed next to good things, only seem to render them more praiseworthy. His view (and in particular his use of the antithesis between secundum existentiam and secundum apparentiam ) was attacked by Peter of Palud, Diego Ruiz de Montoya, and Claude Frassen.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Guy Guldentops (2025) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974602bbb9d90c67120a1behttps://doi.org/10.1484/j.bpm.5.151708
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper