Over an average follow-up of 6.1 years, 53.2% of patients experienced AF/AFL recurrence after catheter ablation, with several independent predictors identified.
Over half of patients undergoing first-time AF ablation experience recurrence over long-term follow-up (average 6.1 years), with early recurrence, female sex, and left atrial structural changes being key predictors.
Absolute Event Rate: 0% vs 0%
ABSTRACT Background Data on atrial fibrillation (AF)/flutter (AFL) recurrence over long‐term follow‐up after catheter ablation of AF are limited. Objective Assess the rate, predictors, and temporal trends of long‐term post‐ablation AF/AFL recurrence. Methods We analyzed consecutive first‐time AF catheter ablations between 2008 and 2022 at our center who were captured in our AF ablation registry and outcomes data were supplemented with chart review. Multivariable predictors of any clinically documented AF/AFL after 3‐month blanking period were identified with a stepwise‐selection multivariable proportional‐hazards model in randomly selected 70% data set and validated in remaining 30%. Results Among 2905 patients who underwent AF ablation (age 62.9 ± 10.5 years; female 30.5%; persistent 43.6%, long‐standing persistent 6.9%; primarily radiofrequency, cryoballoon 18.0%), within 2 years 38.0% had recurrence, and over average 6.1 ± 4.4‐years follow‐up 53.2% recurred. Multivariable predictors of recurrence (all p 3 months) AF/flutter recurrences in remaining 30%. Predictors included recurrence during blanking period (HR 2.42, 95% CI 2.13–2.74), female sex (1.39, 1.22–1.59), each cm increase in LA size (1.34, 1.21–1.49), maximum regional LA fibrosis moderate (1.46, 1.25–1.71) or severe (1.42, 1.14–1.78), every year of AF duration (1.02, 1.00–1.03), and persistent (1.19, 1.03–1.37) or long‐standing persistent AF (1.40, 1.10–1.78).
Cushing et al. (Wed,) reported a other. Over an average follow-up of 6.1 years, 53.2% of patients experienced AF/AFL recurrence after catheter ablation, with several independent predictors identified.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: