Key result
Holter HRV parameters improve AF prediction to ~0.78 AUC in high-risk stroke and TIA patients.
Why the study?
Undetected AF increases recurrent ischaemic stroke risk, but current prediction scores omit routine 24-h Holter ECG heart rate variability measures.
Do routine heart rate variability parameters improve the detection of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with non-AF ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA compared to existing clinical scores?
Do routine heart rate variability parameters improve the detection of incident atrial fibrillation in patients with non-AF ischaemic stroke or high-risk TIA compared to existing clinical scores?
Routine Holter ECG-derived HRV parameters (PNN50, rMSSD, SDSD) significantly enhance the prediction of occult atrial fibrillation in patients with non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA compared to existing clinical scores.
May enhance AF prediction post-stroke/TIA via routine Holter; leaves open prospective validation before clinical adoption.
Introduction Undetected atrial fibrillation (AF) increases the risk of recurrent ischaemic stroke, but current prediction scores do not incorporate heart rate variability (HRV) measures readily available from 24-h Holter ECGs. Methods In 697 patients with non-AF ischaemic stroke or non-AF high-risk transient ischaemic attack (TIA) from the STROKE-CARD Registry (NCT04582825), we assessed eight time-domain HRV parameters for predicting incident AF within 1 year. ROC analyses, logistic regression, and the Youden index were used to identify optimal cut-offs and compare HRV performance with Brown-ESUS AF and AS5F scores. Results New-onset AF was detected in 28 patients (4.0%). PNN50, rMSSD, and SDSD showed the best discrimination (AUC = 0.711, 0.766, and 0.775), outperforming both clinical scores (AUC ≤ 0.612). Optimal cut-offs were 5.5% (PNN50), 48.5 ms (rMSSD), and 43.5 ms (SDSD). Dichotomized analyses confirmed strong associations with AF (ORs 5.34–7.70, all p < 0.001), and adding HRV parameters significantly improved prediction beyond existing scores. Conclusions PNN50, rMSSD, and SDSD from routine Holter ECGs enhance AF risk prediction after non-cardioembolic stroke or high-risk TIA and may support targeted monitoring strategies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Moelgg et al. (2026) studied this question. Heart rate variability parameters PNN50, rMSSD, and SDSD improved atrial fibrillation prediction (AUC up to 0.775) in high-risk TIA and stroke patients.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: