Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Dissertation fieldwork grant examines knowledge creation with nonhumans in primate field schools, suggesting significant educational impacts.
This resource is an application for a Dissertation Fieldwork Grant from the Wenner-Gren Foundation. Building on recent work at the nexus of primatology, science studies, and multispecies anthropology, this research investigates the significance of primate field schools within the discipline of primatology, and more broadly how knowledge is created with nonhumans. Primate field schools are often regarded as an obligatory rite of passage into the world of field primatology, shaping generations of future researchers and offering a valuable source of inquiry about the subdiscipline. This project has four objectives: (1) to assess the influence of primate field schools as a primary training experience for primatologists; (2) to examine how field schools transmit primatological knowledge and communicate epistemic, ethical, and practical values; (3) to understand how field school participants and primate study groups mutually shape knowledge, practice, and experience during the field school; and (4) to explore the impact of this relational dynamic beyond the course. To empirically examine field schools, I adopt the ethnoprimatological approach, a research framework that blends traditional ethology with ethnographic techniques. I document field schools as they unfold by merging primate behavioral data with participant observation and in-depth interviewing. Additionally, I use survey methods and content analysis of field school materials to investigate primate field schools beyond their physical boundaries.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Katherine Hanson (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: