PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics2 citations

Glycemic Outcomes with an Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery System in Adults with Type 1 Diabetes: A 1-Year Real-World Observational Study

View Full Paper
SASandra AmuedoMAMaría Antequera-GonzálezSASharona Azriel

Key Points

  • This study evaluates the long-term effectiveness and safety of the AndroidAPS system in managing glycemic outcomes in adults with Type 1 Diabetes.
  • Retrospective single-center study
  • Involved 27 adults with Type 1 Diabetes
  • Participants used AndroidAPS for 12 months
  • Glycemic metrics were collected through real-time continuous glucose monitoring
  • Time in range increased from 67.8% to 79.9% over 12 months
  • HbA1c decreased from 6.6% to 6.0%
  • Participants achieving time in tight range improved to 63% at 12 months
  • No severe hypoglycemia or diabetic ketoacidosis incidents reported

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of the AndroidAPS (AAPS) system in adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) under real-world clinical conditions. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 27 adults with T1D (mean age 39 ± 9.6 years; 55.6% women; diabetes duration 21.5 ± 11.3 years) who initiated AAPS and were followed for 12 months. Glycemic metrics were obtained from real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) data. Primary outcomes were changes in time in range (TIR; 70–180 mg/dL) and HbA1c. Secondary outcomes included time in tight range (TITR; 70–140 mg/dL), time below range (TBR), coefficient of variation (CV), and the glycemic risk index (GRI). Safety outcomes included severe hypoglycemia and diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Results: TIR increased from 67.8% at baseline to 84.1% at 6 months and 79.9% at 12 months ( P 70% and CV 50% at 6 months, remaining at 63% at 12 months. No episodes of severe hypoglycemia or DKA were reported. Conclusions: AAPS demonstrated sustained long-term effectiveness and safety in adults with T1D under real-world clinical practice conditions. Glycemic outcomes were comparable to those reported with commercially available closed-loop automated insulin delivery systems, supporting AAPS as a viable and effective advanced management option for T1D.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Amuedo et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974610cbb9d90c67120aec6https://doi.org/10.1177/15209156251411937
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Prevalence, Safety, and Metabolic Control Among Danish Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes Using Open-Source Automated Insulin Delivery Systems2024 · 8 citations
  2. 2Evaluation of time in tight range and the glycaemia risk index in adults with type 1 diabetes using an advanced hybrid closed loop system: A 1‐year real‐world assessment2024 · 17 citations
  3. 3Open-Source Versus Commercial Automated Insulin Delivery System for Type 1 Diabetes Management: A Prospective Observational Comparative Study from Canada2025 · 8 citations
  4. 4Real-World Use of Open Source Artificial Pancreas Systems2016 · 185 citations
  5. 5Limitations in Achieving Glycemic Targets From CGM Data and Persistence of Severe Hypoglycemia in Adults With Type 1 Diabetes Regardless of Insulin Delivery Method2024 · 21 citations