Key result
Danish Modified Caregiver Strain Index shows strong validity and reliability among relatives of OHCA survivors.
Why the study?
A Danish version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (M-CSI) was lacking, and its psychometric properties among relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors were unknown.
Cross-Sectional (n=561)
Yes
The Danish version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index is a valid and reliable tool for assessing caregiver strain among relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Enables Danish assessment of caregiver strain post-OHCA; leaves open prospective evaluation of clinical utility.
AIMS: The Modified Caregiver Strain Index (M-CSI) is a 13-item instrument that measures caregiver strain among various populations. A Danish version is lacking, and the psychometric properties among relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) survivors are unknown. This study aimed to translate, cross-culturally adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the Danish version of the M-CSI in relatives of OHCA survivors. METHODS AND RESULTS: The study used data from the national cross-sectional DANCAS (DANish Cardiac Arrest Survivorship) survey, where relatives of OHCA survivors completed the Danish versions of M-CSI, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the World Health Organisation's Five Well-being Index (WHO-5). The M-CSI was forward- and back-translated, pre-tested, and culturally adapted. Structural validity was examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and construct validity was investigated using a priori hypothesis testing (known-groups validity) and correlations with the other instruments (convergent validity/overlapping constructs). The internal consistency reliability was assessed using Cronbach's α. In total, 561 relatives responded (response rate 45%), of which 88% were women, the median age was 64, and 24% reported caregiver strain (M-CSI ≥7). The EFA supported a one-factor structure. Based on the a priori hypotheses, it was confirmed that younger caregivers (<55 years) described more caregiver strain (effect size δ = 0.13; small). Correlations between M-CSI, HADS-A, HADS-D, and WHO-5 were moderate. Internal consistency was α = 0.90. CONCLUSION: The Danish version of the M-CSI demonstrated good structural validity, good internal consistency reliability, and good construct validity in relatives of OHCA survivors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bruvik et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Caregiver strain among relatives of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest survivors (n=561). Danish version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index (M-CSI) was evaluated on Psychometric properties (structural validity, internal consistency, construct validity). The Danish version of the Modified Caregiver Strain Index demonstrated good structural validity, internal consistency (α = 0.90), and construct validity in relatives of OHCA survivors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: