PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Advanced Science1 citationsOpen Access

Aberrant SUMOylation Restricts the Targetable Cancer Immunopeptidome

View Full Paper
UDUta M. DemelMax Delbrück CenterAMAnna MeurerMax Delbrück CenterBZBadeel Kh Q ZaghlaHumboldt-Universität zu Berlin

Key Points

  • To investigate how aberrant SUMOylation impacts the cancer immunopeptidome and T cell immune response.
  • Utilized HLA class-I-targeted ligandomics to assess the immunopeptidome landscape.
  • Analyzed the effects of aberrant SUMOylation on peptide diversity and immune evasion mechanisms.
  • Examined the role of SUMOylation in altering TAP1 binding and immunoproteasome function.
  • Tested pharmacological inhibition of SUMOylation to evaluate impact on T cell susceptibility.
  • Aberrant SUMOylation suppressed a diverse repertoire of HLA-I peptides and neoepitopes.
  • SUMOylation impaired the immunoproteasome's constitution, reducing peptide diversity.
  • Pharmacological inhibition of SUMOylation revealed a targetable immunopeptidome.
  • Inhibition enhanced tumor cell susceptibility to T cell killing, reshaping the immune cell landscape.

Abstract

ABSTRACT A balanced SUMOylation equilibrium safeguards the functional anti‐tumor immune response. Oncogene activation drives SUMOylation, rendering aberrant SUMOylation a hallmark of cancer. To delineate the impact of activated SUMOylation on the tumor‐immune synapse, we applied HLA class‐I‐targeted ligandomics and identified a function of activated SUMOylation in restricting the immunopeptidome landscape. Importantly, aberrant SUMOylation suppressed a unique HLA‐I peptide and oncoprotein‐derived neoepitope repertoire, enabling cancer cells to evade T cell immune surveillance. Mechanistically, SUMOylation impaired the immunoproteasome constitution and proteolytic activity, thus limiting the diversity of the peptide landscape. Further, SUMOylation altered TAP1 transporter binding preferences, thereby mimicking viral immune evasion strategies. As an actionable application, pharmacological inhibition of SUMOylation unmasked the targetable immunopeptidome, enhanced the tumor cell susceptibility to T cell killing and substantially reshaped the immune cell landscape. These findings highlight SUMOylation as a critical regulator of the adaptive anti‐tumor immune response. We propose SUMOylation inhibition as a strategy to enhance immunogenic peptide presentation, thereby improving the efficacy of cancer immunotherapies.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Demel et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746126bb9d90c67120b05dhttps://doi.org/10.1002/advs.202511449
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper