PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Atmospheric measurement techniques2 citationsOpen Access

Forward modeling of spaceborne radar observations

View Full Paper
IMIsaac MoradiSKSatya KalluriYZYanqiu Zhu

Key Points

  • The central aim is to assess the new radar module of the Community Radiative Transfer Model for its effectiveness in simulating radar reflectivities.
  • Evaluated the Community Radiative Transfer Model with a new radar module
  • Used observations from EarthCARE CPR, CloudSat CPR, and GPM DPR
  • Compared simulated radar reflectivities with actual spaceborne measurements
  • Assessed impacts of hydrometeor profiles, particle size distributions, and frozen hydrometeor habits.
  • Simulated reflectivities were significantly influenced by particle size distributions and shapes.
  • Differences of up to 4 dBZ were observed in snow particle habits at W-band frequencies.
  • Thompson PSD showed better agreement with GPM DPR observations compared to Abel PSD.
  • The study highlights the sensitivity of forward simulations to microphysical assumptions.

Abstract

Abstract. Accurate forward models, particularly radiative transfer models, are essential for the assimilation of both passive and active satellite observations in modern data assimilation frameworks. The Community Radiative Transfer Model (CRTM), widely used in the assimilation of satellite observations within numerical weather prediction systems, especially in the United States, has recently been expanded to include a radar module. This study assesses the new module across multiple radar frequencies using observations from the Earth Clouds, Aerosols and Radiation Explorer Cloud Profiling Radar (EarthCARE CPR), the CloudSat CPR, and the Global Precipitation Measurement Dual-Frequency Precipitation Radar (GPM DPR). Simulated radar reflectivities were compared with the spaceborne measurements to evaluate the impacts of hydrometeor profiles, particle size distributions (PSDs), and frozen hydrometeor habits. The results indicate that both PSD selection and particle shape largely influence the simulated reflectivities, with snow particle habits introducing differences of up to 4 dBZ in W-band comparisons. For the GPM DPR, reflectivities simulated using the Thompson PSD showed closer agreement with the observations than those using the Abel PSD; this agreement should be interpreted in the context of the limited independence between the observations and the retrievals used as input to the CRTM, which themselves rely on PSD-related assumptions. The sensitivity of forward radar simulations to microphysical assumptions, underscores their importance in the assimilation of radar observations in numerical weather forecast models.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Moradi et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69746149bb9d90c67120b20fhttps://doi.org/10.5194/amt-19-549-2026
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper