PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026International Journal of Qualitative Methods0 citationsOpen Access

The Need for an Interpersonal and Institutional Ethic of Care when Working Alongside Lived Experience Researchers: “For me there’s no lived , it’s always living ”

View Full Paper
CECharlene Hue-Ming EdwardsKBKaren BlockCVCathy Vaughan

Key Points

  • To explore how universities can better support lived experience researchers in their involvement in research.
  • Qualitative research utilizing a phenomenological approach
  • Reflexive thematic analysis of interview data
  • Interviews with sixteen lived experience researchers
  • Data collected through face-to-face and online semi-structured interviews
  • Identified six key themes related to the experiences of lived experience researchers
  • Emphasized the importance of trust, responsible leadership, and an ethic of care
  • Highlighted that lived experience research is a methodology rather than a trend
  • Pointed out that poor management can lead to inequity and disempowerment

Abstract

Lived experience (LE) researchers are often lay people who work alongside academics to undertake research within their own communities, particularly in the fields of health and social inquiry. High-quality and rigorous LE research can lead to local, national and international policy and practice impacts; however, if managed poorly, the involvement of LE researchers has the potential to be extractive, inequitable and disempowering. There is a need to understand how universities can support more sustainable and enduring forms of co-investigation with LE researchers. This qualitative research study utilised a phenomenological approach and reflexive thematic analysis in order to understand the lived experiences of LE researchers. Sixteen former and current LE researchers who worked with researchers from an Australian university participated in face-to-face and online semi-structured interviews between May to July 2024. We identified six key themes: (1) LE researchers are motivated to create change; (2) LE research can be both rewarding and taxing; (3) trust must be earned, nurtured and reciprocated; (4) power sharing is less important than responsible leadership; (5) LE research is a methodology NOT a ‘fashion’; and (6) an institutional ethic of care is critical. A social ecological model is used to discuss the implications of the findings at an intrapersonal, interpersonal, institutional and policy level. Given participation has become the new zeitgeist and involvement of people with LE in research is fast becoming a prerequisite for some funding streams, it is important to intentionally establish foundational building blocks supporting the ethical and equitable participation of LE researchers across the social ecological model.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Edwards et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6974616cbb9d90c67120b3a5https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069261417902
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper