A scoping review maps ethical dilemmas in end-of-life care for Muslim patients, suggesting culturally sensitive engagement is essential.
Introduction: Muslims constitute the largest religious minority in Euro-American countries. Interactions between Muslim patients and healthcare providers in end-of-life care may give rise to religio-cultural ethical dilemmas, resulting in tensions. Understanding these tensions may support care providers in navigating the critical transition from life to death within non-Muslim majority contexts. Aim: To thematically map ethical tensions arising from religio-cultural dilemmas in end-of-life care for Muslim patients, and to equip healthcare professionals in Euro-American contexts with the insights needed to address them. Design: A scoping review was conducted in accordance with the Johanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. Data sources: A comprehensive literature search was performed in Scopus, Medline, CINAHL, and APA PsycInfo, from inception to 7 November 2024, in collaboration with a medical information specialist. Empirical studies addressing religio-cultural ethical dilemmas and tensions in end-of-life care for Muslims were included. Analysis: Ethical tensions were examined using a structured framework integrating theological perspectives with empirical findings. Results: Of 9237 records screened, 12 studies met the inclusion criteria. Three overarching themes emerged: (1) end-of-life communication, (2) spiritualizing pain, and (3) treatment withholding/withdrawal. Tensions were most pronounced when divergent moral frameworks prioritized conflicting principles. Conclusions: Ethical tensions in end-of-life care for Muslim patients in Euro-American healthcare settings reflect diverse, context-dependent interpretations of Islamic principles. Addressing these tensions requires early, culturally sensitive engagement and the development of a shared ethical framework in close collaboration with healthcare providers, Muslim chaplains, mosques, imams, and umbrella organizations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Muishout et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: