Study investigates how technological turbulence influences job performance through crafting behaviors, suggesting colleagues' roles impact outcomes.
Purpose Drawing on job demands-resources theory and social influence perspective (crossover, emotional contagion, and social learning), this study aims to investigate how technological turbulence shapes employees' job performance, with a particular focus on the mediating role of employees' approach crafting and the moderating influence of colleagues' avoidance crafting. Design/methodology/approach A multi-method approach was adopted. Study 1 utilized a vignette experiment (N = 151) to examine the causal effect of technological turbulence on employees' approach crafting. Study 2, a dyadic field survey (N = 452 dyads), was conducted to validate the overall hypothesized model and enhance the robustness and ecological validity of the findings. Finally, Study 3 (N = 220) employed another vignette experiment to further confirm that colleagues' avoidance crafting significantly moderated the effect of employees' approach crafting on job performance. Findings Technological turbulence exerts a positive indirect effect on employees' job performance via increased engagement in approach crafting. However, this indirect effect is contingent on colleagues' avoidance crafting: when colleagues exhibit high levels of avoidance crafting, the positive impact of technological turbulence via approach crafting is significantly weakened. Originality/value This study advances micro-level understanding of technological turbulence by unpacking its indirect influence on employee outcomes through self-initiated work behaviors. By incorporating a social-relational lens into job crafting research, the study reveals that colleagues' behaviors critically shape the effectiveness of employees' adaptive strategies – offering novel insights into the collective dynamics of job design in turbulent environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: