Comparative analysis of gas adsorption performance in standing and zigzag ZnO nanowires, indicating design implications for gas sensors.
Gas adsorption is intrinsically governed by the surface structure of sensing materials, where a large surface area and a high reactivity are critical for optimal performance. Nanostructured materials, with their exceptional surface-to-volume ratios, offer enhanced sensing capabilities. In this study, we designed two distinct ZnO nanowire morphologies (standing and zigzag) and used reactive force field molecular dynamics (ReaxFF-MD) simulations to evaluate their adsorption performance for O₂, H₂, Cl₂, CH₂O, C₂H₆O, and C₃H₆O at 300 K with an initial gas level of 200 molecules per system. The results show that all molecules fully adsorb on the ZnO nanowire surfaces, O₂ dissociates into O atoms, and C₂H₆O dissociates into C₂H₅O and H atoms, both attached to the surface. Energy analysis shows that standing nanowires exhibit more negative adsorption energies for nonpolar gases (O₂, -10317.26 kcal/mol; H₂, -385.67 kcal/mol; Cl₂, -19000 kcal/mol), whereas zigzag nanowires favor polar molecules (CH₂O, -9380 kcal/mol; C₂H₆O, -8568.58 kcal/mol; C₃H₆O, -6897.73 kcal/mol). Both morphologies display a two-stage adsorption process, with adsorption numbers in the second stage decreasing in the following order: O₂ > C₂H₆O > CH₂O > C₃H₆O > Cl₂ > H₂. Compared to zigzag nanowires, standing nanowires adsorb 136 O₂, 9 H₂, 15 Cl₂, 38 CH₂O, 53 C₂H₆O, and 29 C₃H₆O molecules, whereas zigzag nanowires adsorb 129 O₂, 10 H₂, 18 Cl₂, 37 CH₂O, 44 C₂H₆O, and 27 C₃H₆O molecules. In both morphologies, O₂ adsorption leads to a strong improvement in sensitivity. These results pave the way for smarter nanoscale designs in next-generation gas sensors.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ftahi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: