Demonstrates a novel method for aligning neural activity with subjective experience, implying new insights in neuroscience.
A fundamental challenge in computational neuroscience lies in quantifying the structural correspondence between high-dimensional neural representations and the low-dimensional phenomenal space of subjective experience. Current approaches lack a principled metric framework that can compare these disparate spaces without requiring coordinate alignment. We introduce a novel computational pipeline combining Gromov–Wasserstein (GW) optimal transport with topological data analysis (TDA) to establish unsupervised alignment between neural activity patterns and phenomenal structure. Our framework defines a hybrid phenomenal metric incorporating information-geometric and dynamical components, with a rigorous derivation connecting temporal synchronization (Kuramoto coherence) to spatial curvature. We validate our approach on two systems: (1) a synthetic “Color Ring” model demonstrating recovery of circular topology (β1 = 1) with alignment GW = 0.042 ± 0.005, and (2) a recurrent neural network (RNN) trained on spatial navigation, where emergent manifold structure aligns with task geometry (GW = 0.078 ± 0.012) without explicit topological supervision. Both show significant improvement over shuffled controls (GW = 0.350±0.020, p < 0.001). Sensitivity analysis reveals critical thresholds in metric parameters corresponding to phase transitions in alignment quality. We propose three falsification protocols targeting anesthesia-induced topological collapse, crossmodal geometric isometry, and adversarial validation. This work provides a mathematically rigorous framework for investigating the geometric relationship between neural computation and phenomenal experience.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
E. G. Reis (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: