PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026Transforming Government People Process and Policy1 citations

Perceived quality and user satisfaction: an evaluation of a Brazilian transparency portal

View Full Paper
VZVinícius Costa da Silva ZonattoELEliete dos Reis LehnhartKVKelmara Mendes VieiraUniversidade Federal de Santa Maria

Key Points

  • This study aims to evaluate perceived quality and user satisfaction with a Brazilian Transparency Portal.
  • Conducted a survey with 410 users of the Transparency Portal.
  • Assessed perceived quality through three dimensions: System Quality, Information Quality, Operation Quality.
  • Identified challenges related to data location, accuracy, and user access time.
  • Users showed partial agreement on the quality of the Portal.
  • Main challenges included difficulties in data retrieval and information accuracy.
  • Improvement opportunities suggested enhancing search filters and user guidance.

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to investigate perceived quality and user satisfaction with a Brazilian Transparency Portal. Design/methodology/approach A survey was conducted with a sample of 410 users of the Transparency Portal. Findings The results indicate partial agreement regarding users’ perception of the Portal’s quality, assessed through three dimensions (SQ: System Quality, IQ: Information Quality, OQ: Operation Quality). The main challenges identified are related to data location and information retrieval (SQ), accuracy and comprehensibility of the information (IQ) and users’ ability to obtain the needed data and information within the shortest possible access time (OQ). Improvement opportunities identified include: (a) IQ: implementing advanced search filters and quick search functions, reference terms, keywords or related words to facilitate information retrieval, as well as including and providing supplementary materials such as reference documents and cost information spreadsheets; (b) SQ: offering tutorials and guidance materials to improve navigation and accessibility for users with lower levels of digital literacy and expertise; and (c) OQ: making access and dissemination of information more user-friendly for those with limited digital skills, increasing file-loading speed and expanding access formats. Originality/value This study contributes by evaluating both quality and user satisfaction with a Brazilian Transparency Portal, and by proposing a new measure for assessing quality.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zonatto et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697461a8bb9d90c67120b81ahttps://doi.org/10.1108/tg-09-2025-0294
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Barriers and Development Directions for the Publication and Usage of Open Data: A Socio-Technical View2014 · 97 citations
  2. 2A National Customer Satisfaction Barometer: The Swedish Experience1992 · 2,366 citations
  3. 3Adaptive social media communication for web-based accountability2023 · 13 citations
  4. 4When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM2018 · 26,098 citations
  5. 5Platform governance for sustainable development: Reshaping citizen-administration relationships in the digital age2018 · 189 citations