PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 24, 2026International Journal of Disaster Risk Science6 citationsOpen Access

Assessing and Optimizing Urban Dynamic Resilience to Extreme Rainfall from Shock to Recovery

View Full Paper
LZLinmei ZhuangMWMing WangKLKai Liu

Key Points

  • The research aims to assess and optimize urban dynamic resilience to extreme rainfall using a comprehensive framework.
  • Developed a three-phase framework combining machine learning and factorial experiments.
  • Used the Prep_shock index to evaluate data from over 220 Chinese cities between 2019 and 2022.
  • Conducted spatial diagnostics and identified resilience categories for cities.
  • Identified high-resilience areas, including Shandong coastal cities and Yangtze River Delta city clusters.
  • 75.6% of cities categorized as having balanced resilience, with recovery times decreasing from west to east.
  • Found redundancy as the primary driver of resilience, with implications for infrastructure and emergency support.

Abstract

Abstract Climate change has intensified extreme rainfall events, challenging progress toward SDG 11’s urban resilience targets. Current assessment methods often neglect dynamic recovery processes and regional precipitation disparities. We propose a three-phase framework combining interpretable machine learning (ML) and factorial experiments, using the Prepₛhock index that integrates standardized rainfall intensity, capital exposure, and historical probability, to evaluate the dynamic resilience of 220+ Chinese cities from 2019 to 2022. Key findings reveal that: (1) The Prepₛhock index effectively eliminates north-south precipitation biases, identifying Shandong coastal cities and Yangtze River Delta city clusters (36. 2%) as high-resilience areas, in contrast to Henan Province. COVID-19 exacerbated systemic risks in megacities, undermining their capital protection capacities. (2) Spatial diagnostics classify 75. 6% of the cities into Quadrant III (the balanced resilience category), with recovery times decreasing from the west to the east. Super-large cities like Zhengzhou (2021) exhibited critical recovery deficiencies (Quadrant IV). (3) Interpretable ML models (XGBoost/EBM) identify redundancy as the dominant resilience driver—robustness governs baseline resilience, while recovery relies on emergency support (for example, hospital beds density and fiscal inputs) and redundant infrastructure (for example, road network density). (4) Factorial experiments reveal optimization trade-offs: simultaneous enhancement of rapidity and redundancy diminishes their individual benefits, necessitating context-specific prioritization. The study advances dynamic resilience assessment methods and proposes quadrant-specific strategies for tailored urban adaptation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhuang et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697461a8bb9d90c67120b913https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-025-00683-w
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper