Mass cytometry identifies immune alterations in T and B cells associated with vedolizumab response in ulcerative colitis, suggesting new biomarkers.
BACKGROUND Vedolizumab (VDZ) is a therapeutic antibody for ulcerative colitis (UC) that targets the α4β7 integrin, a key mediator of lymphocyte trafficking to the gut, thereby inhibiting gut homing of lymphocytes. However, its clinical efficacy remains suboptimal, with fewer than half of patients achieving long-term remission. Therefore, a deeper understanding of the immunological mechanisms of VDZ and the identification of reliable biomarkers to predict therapeutic response are therefore essential. METHODS Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from healthy controls (n = 26), patients with active UC (n = 26), VDZ non-responders (n = 8), and responders (n = 8) were analyzed by mass cytometry. Responders/non-responders were defined by endoscopic reassessment after vedolizumab induction using the Nancy histological index (≥2 = non-responders, < 2 = responders). Data were analyzed in OMIQ. RESULTS Five immune alterations were observed in VDZ responders: 1. CD4 subset cluster: α4+β7+β1∧low CD45RO+ CD62L- CD27- HLA-DR∧low CD69∧low CD38∧low CD127+ CD25∧low (TEM-like CD4+ T cells): Significantly increased vs UC active (p < 0.05). 2. IgA subset cluster: α4+β7+ β1∧int CD19∧low CD20- CD27∧low CD24- CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD69+ CD11c- IgA+ (IgA+ plasmablast-like cells): Significantly decreased vs UC active (p < 0.05). 3. IgA subset cluster: α4+β7+β1∧low CD19+ CD20+ CD11c∧high CD27- CD24- CD38- HLA-DR+ CD69+ CXCR5- IgA+ (IgA+ atypical/extrafollicular memory B cell–like cells): Significantly lower in responders vs non-responders (p < 0.05) and uniquely distinguished responders from non-responders. 4. IgG subset cluster: α4+β7∧int β1∧int CD19∧low CD20- CD27∧low CD24∧low CD38+ HLA-DR+ CD69+ CD11c- IgG+ (IgG+ plasmablast-like cells): Significantly decreased vs UC active (p < 0.05). 5. CD19 subset cluster: α4+β1+β7∧low CD19+ CD20+ CD24+ CD38- HLA-DR+ CD69+ CD27∧low CXCR5+ (memory B cell–like cells): Significantly decreased vs UC active (p < 0.05). DISCUSSION Cluster 1 (CD4 subset) likely reflects redistribution of α4β7+CD4+ T cells, predominantly TEM-like, due to VDZ-mediated gut-homing blockade and may serve as a pharmacodynamic marker. Clusters 2 (IgA subset) and 4 (IgG subset) showed decreases consistent with previously reported reduction of plasmablasts in VDZ responders, likely secondary to improved inflammation and GALT attrition. Importantly, the decrease in cluster 3 (IgA subset) represents the only immune signature that differentiates responders from non-responders. Its persistent elevation in non-responders and return to healthy control levels in responders suggest that it is a promising on-treatment biomarker for monitoring therapeutic response. These findings highlight B cell–related changes as robust predictors of treatment outcome and support their integration into precision medicine strategies for UC.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Horitani et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: