Exploratory analysis reveals varying AI guidelines in different countries, suggesting the need for a unified model.
Purpose This paper aims to examine artificial intelligence (AI)-related ethical considerations and governance in select countries through an exploratory approach, studying recent research in the domain. Design/methodology/approach A model with an appropriate rationale has been developed to address the gaps in AI ethical considerations and governance, complementing the prevailing shortcomings of AI systems and processes in the financial sectors of select countries. Findings The authors found that some countries had stringent AI considerations and guidelines, while others had comparatively loose guidelines. To address the inconsistencies, a model covering the relevant dimensions has been framed, which can fill the current gaps in the countries studied or to be analyzed using this framework. Originality/value The research discusses and analyzes the multidimensional facets of AI, as well as the risks that should be assessed and mitigated in organizations, with a focus on country-specific guidelines.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Varshney et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: