Version 11.0 presents a new physics kernel modeling dynamics across scales, indicating unified geometric principles.
This release presents Version 11.0 of the Geometric Theory of the Universe (GTU). It introduces universe_engine_v3.py, a unified, deterministic physics kernel that successfully simulates dynamics across quantum, planetary, and cosmological scales using a single set of geometric principles. Key Innovation: Multi-Scale UnificationUnlike previous iterations, this version demonstrates that the fundamental geometric constants (S=601,451S = 601,451S=601,451 and a=4,389a = 4,389a=4,389) produce valid physical behaviors across 60+ orders of magnitude without parameter fitting: Micro Scale (Quantum): Accurately models electron wavefunction evolution and derives the fine-structure constant (α−1≈137.036α⁻¹ ≈ 137.036α−1≈137.036) with $0.000%$ error relative to CODATA 2022. Macro Scale (Solar System): Simulates stable N-body planetary orbits with correct periods (Earth T=1.00T=1.00T=1.00 yr) and energy conservation. Cosmological Scale (Galactic): Reproduces flat galactic rotation curves and MOND-like acceleration behavior, demonstrating that "dark matter" effects emerge naturally from geometric corrections. Included Files Core Software: universe_engine_v3.py: The main multi-scale physics engine (Micro/Meso/Macro/Cosmic modes). cosmology_ktm.py: Specialized module for cosmological parameter evolution (ΩmΩ_mΩm, H0H_0H0). verification_suite.py: Automated testing framework that validates 10 falsifiable predictions. Documentation: gtu_ktm_whitepaper.pdf: The comprehensive theoretical paper (20 pages) detailing the derivation of constants and the "Game Designer" methodology. README.md: Instructions for installation, usage, and reproducing the simulations. CHANGELOG.md: History of the project's evolution from v9 to v11. Verification Data: verification_results.json: Machine-readable results of the automated test suite. verification_report.html: Interactive visual report of the simulation results. MethodologyThis project utilizes an "adversarial AI collaboration" approach. The code and theory were refined through iterative critique and refactoring by multiple AI systems (Claude Sonnet 4.5, GPT-5.2, Gemini 3 Pro, DeepAgent) acting as skeptical peer reviewers and engineers, ensuring mathematical rigor and code stability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Julian Zoria (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: