This formal theory reveals how commitment in complex symbolic systems affects profitability in adversarial engagements.
We present an axiomatic model of adversarial symbolic interaction rooted in information theory and optimal stopping. Within a stylized continuous-time framework, we show that an Initiator who is committed to sustaining a high-complexity symbolic system faces a cumulative utility that diverges to negative infinity as the commitment horizon grows. By contrast, we model the Responder's position as a real option and characterize the value extraction problem as a strictly concave optimal-stopping problem. We derive a closed-form Dominance Coefficient c(L0)c(L_0)c(L0), giving the measure of parameter configurations under which engagement is profitable for the Responder. In high-complexity regimes, this coefficient decays inversely in the base complexity L0L_0L0, so that long-run initiation becomes generically loss-making while profitable response opportunities become measure-zero in the limit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jarred Ramo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: