This analysis reveals exponential differences in privacy guarantees of bundled vs unbundled designs in federated learning, indicating significant implications for data security.
Exact asymptotic GDP parameters for shuffle model federated learning via chi-squared divergence. Proves exponential separation between bundled and unbundled shuffling designs in feasible SGD iterations. - After publication, the following related works were identified that share conceptual connections with this paper: 1. Su, Cheng, Wang (arXiv:2504.07414, 2025) analyze "joint composition" in shuffle model where user outputs are shuffled as a tuple — conceptually similar to our "bundled" regime. Their focus is on (ε,δ)-DP bounds via FFT, not µ-GDP with χ²-parameterization. 2. Su, Cheng, Wang (arXiv:2511.15051, 2025) show χ²(P‖Q) appears in mutual information asymptotics for shuffle model. Our contribution uses χ² for µ-GDP (differential privacy), not information-theoretic leakage. 3. Chen, Cao, Ge (AAAI 2024, arXiv:2312.14388) provide f-DP analysis for personalized LDP shuffle settings. They do not derive closed-form µ² expressions parameterized solely by χ²(W₁‖W₀). The core contributions of this paper remain novel: • Exact closed-form µ²n,un = mχ²/n and µ²n,bd = ((1+χ²)^m - 1)/n • Explicit exponential separation ratio Θ((1+χ²)^m/m) • SGD iteration bounds under µ-GDP budget A revised version with expanded Related Work is planned for journal submission.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alex B. Shvets (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: