This framework improves sEMG data authenticity in sparse conditions, suggesting enhanced model performance in muscle signal analysis.
The scarcity of high-quality surface electromyography (sEMG) data, caused by ethical constraints, privacy concerns, and noise interference, poses significant challenges for developing robust deep learning models in sEMG analysis. Multi-channel sEMG signals exhibit complex inter-channel correlations reflecting neuromuscular coordination. However, existing generative methods suffer from error accumulation in sequential channel generation, insufficient inter-channel relationship modeling, and lack of physiological constraints, producing data-driven valid but physiologically implausible signals that compromise biological fidelity for clinical applications. To address these fundamental limitations, we propose a Muscle Synergy-Constrained Conditional GAN (MS-cGAN) framework that simultaneously generates multi-channel sEMG signals while preserving bio-mechanical fidelity. Firstly, A novel Graph Convolutional Network (GCN)-based generator architecture specifically tailored for sparse sEMG signals, which enables the generator to capture and model complex inter-channel relationship features through graph-based representation learning, thereby circumventing error accumulation issues by leveraging the inherent inter-channel correlations. Secondly, Integration of Muscle Synergy (MS) prior constraints as dynamic loss functions based on MS theory, which enforces generator optimization within a physiologically plausible parameter space and ensures signals maintain synergistic consistency with underlying physiological mechanisms. Lastly, experiments on IRASS datasets and public datasets (NinaPro DB1 and DB2) demonstrate that MS-cGAN significantly improves signal authenticity and enhances downstream task performance compared to traditional GANs and state-of-the-art diffusion models. The generated data effectively supplement scarce sEMG datasets and improve kinematic prediction precision for deep learning models.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: