What question did this study set out to answer?

The paper examines the role of the sensitive and intellectual potencies of the human soul in defining the human species.

January 25, 2026

From First to Second Averroism. The Attribution of Article 113: Quod homo est homo praeter animam rationalem (Paris 1277)

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

BPBERNARDINI P.

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Illustrates the evolution of human specificity linked to the sensitive faculty within medieval commentaries, indicating its philosophical significance.

Key Points

The paper examines the role of the sensitive and intellectual potencies of the human soul in defining the human species.
Analyzed commentaries on the De anima from 1240 to 1270
Explored the debates surrounding the specific difference of humans
Investigated the historical context of the Parisian condemnation of 1277
Identifies sensitive faculty as a key element in human specificity
Suggests article 113 may have originated from John of Secheville's teachings
Highlights the evolution of the doctrine concerning the potencies of the soul

Cite This Study

BERNARDINI P. (2017) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b306feba4585c2d6e7d1 https://doi.org/10.2143/rtpm.84.1.3212075

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Illustrates the evolution of human specificity linked to the sensitive faculty within medieval commentaries, indicating its philosophical significance.

From First to Second Averroism. The Attribution of Article 113: Quod homo est homo praeter animam rationalem (Paris 1277)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

From First to Second Averroism. The Attribution of Article 113: Quod homo est homo praeter animam rationalem (Paris 1277)

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider