PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 25, 2026International Journal of Disaster Risk Science3 citationsOpen Access

Optimal Seismic Intensity Measures for Slopes at Various Heights Under Vertical and Horizontal Ground Motions

View Full Paper
DTDung Thi Phuong TranHNHoang D. NguyenJFJianbo Fei

Key Points

  • This research aims to identify optimal intensity measures for assessing slope stability during seismic events.
  • Examined 19 intensity measures of ground motion through numerical simulations.
  • Analyzed slopes at three different heights under vertical and horizontal ground motion.
  • Assessed maximum permanent displacement as an engineering demand parameter.
  • Sustained maximum acceleration and sustained maximum velocity identified as the most effective intensity measures.
  • Sustained maximum acceleration recommended for lower-height slopes under horizontal ground motion.
  • Sustained maximum velocity more suitable for taller slopes under horizontal motion.
  • In combined motions, sustained maximum acceleration is optimal for all heights.
  • Peak ground acceleration is deemed unsuitable for the assessed slopes.

Abstract

Abstract Identifying the optimal intensity measures (IMs) of ground motion is a critical step in the seismic fragility analysis of slopes using probabilistic seismic demand models. In this study, we investigated various IMs of earthquake ground motions, considering both vertical and horizontal components that can trigger landslides, through numerical simulations. A set of 19 IMs was examined for three heights of slopes. The optimal IMs were assessed using the maximum permanent displacement as an engineering demand parameter. The findings reveal that acceleration-related parameters specifically sustained maximum acceleration (SMA) and root-mean-square of acceleration, and velocity-related parameters namely sustained maximum velocity (SMV) and peak ground velocity, are the most effective IMs for slopes subjected to both vertical and horizontal ground motions. For slopes subjected exclusively to horizontal ground motion, SMA is recommended as the optimal IM for lower-height slopes, while SMV is more suitable for the taller slope. In contrast, for models subjected to combined horizontal and vertical ground motions, SMA is consistently identified as the optimal IM for slope across all heights. Notably, the study concludes that peak ground acceleration, a commonly used parameter in seismic analysis, is unsuitable for the considered slopes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Tran et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6975b306feba4585c2d6e911https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-026-00696-z
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper