Single-center cohort study shows association between urinary pH levels and survival in lung cancer, suggesting potential for future interventions.
Acidic tumor microenvironments promote malignant progression, immune evasion, and drug resistance. This single-center retrospective cohort study evaluated whether, among patients with stage IV non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who participated in a pragmatic "alkalization therapy"-defined as a low potential renal acid load diet plus oral sodium bicarbonate and/or potassium/sodium citrate-urinary pH was associated with long-term survival, and whether these associations differed by EGFR/ALK mutation status. Urinary pH was used as a surrogate marker of systemic alkalization. All consecutive patients with stage IV NSCLC who first attended Karasuma Wada Clinic between January 2014, and December 2019 were included (n = 203; EGFR/ALK mutation-negative, n = 100; EGFR/ALK mutation-positive, n = 103). All outpatients received standardized instruction in alkalization therapy. For each patient, a mean urine pH value (excluding the first visit) was calculated. Survival was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods with log-rank and Gehan-Breslow-Wilcoxon tests, and Cox proportional hazards regression models incorporating recurrence status and urine pH. Overall, the 5-year survival rate was 49·0 % and was similar by mutation status (EGFR/ALK mutation-positive, 49·9 %; EGFR/ALK mutation-negative, 48·6 %). Among EGFR/ALK mutation-negative patients, postoperative recurrence was associated with a more favorable outcome than de novo stage IV disease at initial diagnosis (5-year survival 65·5 % vs 42·0 %; log-rank p = 0·02). In this subgroup, a mean urine pH ≥7·5 was associated with superior 5-year survival (70·0 % vs 39·3 %; log-rank p = 0·04). Given potential confounding, this shows association-not a causal benefit. Urinary pH may serve as a pragmatic marker of acid-base status, particularly in EGFR/ALK-mutation-negative disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kachi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: