Network analysis reports reciprocal taste processing interactions in awake rats, suggesting significant implications for taste perception.
Gustatory cortical (GC) and basolateral amygdalar (BLA) taste responses consist of an inter-regionally coherent 3-part state sequence. This coherence suggests that reciprocal BLA-GC connectivity is important for taste processing, but it remains unknown: 1) whether BLA-GC coherence actually reflects a reciprocal “conversation” (as opposed to one region simply driving the other); and 2) whether such a “conversation” has anything to do with the taste processing observed within GC response dynamics. Here, we address these questions using network and single-neuron analysis of simultaneously-recorded GC and BLA taste responses in awake rats. We find asymmetric, reciprocal µ-frequency influences that reflect taste processing dynamics: BLA→GC influence dominates between 300 and 1000msec (the epoch in which BLA codes palatability); afterward, when GC responses become palatability-related and GC has been shown to release a behavior-relevant signal, the direction of influence reverses, becoming GC→BLA. Follow-up analyses demonstrate that this “turn-taking” exists alongside effectively synchronous amygdala-cortical coupling—the two regions functioning as a unified structure. Finally, to assess the implications of these interactions for single-neuron responses, we tested the response properties of GC neurons categorized by their inferred connectivity with BLA: GC neurons influenced by BLA produce stronger taste-specific and palatability-related responses than other GC neurons, and the strongest taste encoding is specifically found in GC neurons that both influence and receive influence from BLA—those most deeply embedded in the reciprocal circuit. These results, consistent with findings in multiple systems, support the novel conclusion that taste processing and decision-making is a function of the amygdala-cortical loop.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mahmood et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: