This analysis challenges the stigma against clichés in literature, suggesting a reevaluation of their significance in artistic expression.
There is no more damning literary judgment than clichéd . Art and writing that traffics in stereotypes fail to incite insight. Clichés bespeak laziness. But what if this judgment is, itself, also a cliché? This paper investigates literature’s most maligned storehouse of cultural expectation. It argues that prejudice against the hackneyed derives from an overemphasis on the value of novelty within artistic expression. As a result, we misrepresent what a cliché is and malign what it does. The paper presents a new way of defining clichés, and in the process demonstrates their relevance to how we evaluate and teach literature.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
James Nikopoulos (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: