We propose a resolution to the P vs NP problem based on the thermodynamics of information. By treating computation as a physical process occurring within a finite entropic graph (Kernel v3), we demonstrate that solving NP-Complete problems requires a global entropy reduction that scales exponentially with energetic cost. Key Results: Spectral Gap Closing: We show that the energy gap between the solution state and error states closes exponentially (Δ ≈ e-α N), implying that the time required for adiabatic evolution diverges for large N. Thermodynamic Censorship Principle: We introduce the principle that the universe physically censors the execution of polynomial-time algorithms for NP-Hard problems via the irreducible cost of measurement (TRI) and thermal noise floor. Numerical Validation: Simulations on 3-SAT Hamiltonians confirm that solution fidelity collapses under any non-zero thermal noise as problem size increases. Conclusion: P ≠ NP not due to lack of algorithms, but due to the Second Law of Thermodynamics. The class P represents thermodynamically allowed trajectories, while NP represents trajectories requiring exponentially improbable entropy reversals.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Douglas H. M. FULBER (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: