PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 20260 citationsOpen Access

A Theoretical Framework for Climate Vulnerability and Gendered Livelihoods in South Sudan: An Intersectional Analysis of Politics and Finance in Selected Regions (2021-2026)

View Full Paper
EJElia Lona JamesUnited States Institute of Peace

Key Points

  • The article aims to explore how political and financial frameworks influence climate vulnerability for women in South Sudan.
  • Develops a theoretical framework combining feminist political ecology and critical finance studies.
  • Analyzes power relations and financial flows affecting climate finance distribution.
  • Engages with African epistemic perspectives to critique Eurocentric climate governance.
  • Identifies a maldistribution of climate finance that disproportionately impacts women.
  • Highlights the intersection of political patronage and conflict economies contributing to women's marginalization.
  • Suggests that current responses inadequately address women's needs in energy access and decision-making.

Abstract

This theoretical article addresses a critical gap in understanding how intersecting political and financial structures mediate climate vulnerability for women in South Sudan's gendered livelihood systems. It interrogates why, despite escalating climate extremes, existing responses fail to address the disproportionate burdens borne by women, particularly in securing energy for household and productive uses. The article develops a novel analytical framework by synthesising feminist political ecology with critical finance studies. This synthesis provides an intersectional analysis to deconstruct how power relations and financial flows—such as those within entrenched political patronage and conflict economies—produce a maldistribution of climate finance. Consequently, this nexus systematically restricts women's access to sustainable energy solutions and marginalises them from decision-making, thereby reinforcing pre-existing inequalities. The framework's rigour is strengthened by engaging with African epistemic perspectives, drawing on scholarly critiques of Eurocentric climate governance to foreground the socio-political production of risk. By moving beyond technocratic solutions, the framework offers a vital analytical tool for researchers and policymakers aiming to design equitable, context-sensitive interventions that target the root causes of gendered vulnerability in South Sudan's evolving climate landscape.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Elia Lona James (2022) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703af722626c4468e8aaehttps://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18360650
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Intersecting Climates: A Gendered Analysis of Energy, Politics, and Finance in South Sudan's Vulnerable States (2021–2026)2025
  2. 2Intersecting Crises: Climate Vulnerability, Gendered Livelihoods, and the Prospects for Women's Leadership in South Sudan (2021–2026)2021
  3. 3Gender, Climate Finance, and Community-Based Adaptation in South Sudan:Barriers and Opportunities for Women-Led Resilience2026
  4. 4Climate Change, Gender, and Governance: A Multisectoral Analysis of South Sudan's Vulnerable Regions (2021–2026)2021
  5. 5An Intervention Study on Climate Resilience, Gender, and Political Economy in South Sudan: A Multi-State Analysis (2021–2026)2021