Qualitative research identifies factors impacting job satisfaction in construction artisans, suggesting measures to improve well-being and economic growth.
Purpose Enhancing the job satisfaction of construction artisans may offer a promising mechanism to improve workers' mental health and the performance of infrastructural projects. These are components of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 3 and 8, and achieving them may be challenging. This study examines the factors hindering job satisfaction. It proposes measures to enhance artisans' well-being and economic growth in infrastructure provisions by improving the job satisfaction mechanism for construction artisans, thereby improving the achievement of SDGs 3 and 8, with the support of Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene Theory. Design/methodology/approach The research employed a qualitative research design. The researchers collected data through interviews with selected experts on the job satisfaction of construction artisans and the achievement of SDGs 3 and 8 in Nigeria. The researchers covered Abuja and Lagos, Nigeria. The researchers also accomplished saturation at the 39th interviewee. The researchers adopted a thematic method to analyse the primary data. Findings The findings reveal 29 perceived hindrances to construction artisans' job satisfaction in infrastructure provision. Thus, improving the achievement of SDGs 3 and 8 concerning artisans may be endangered if these hindrances are not curbed. Originality/value The adoption of Herzberg's Motivation-Hygiene Theory to support the framework in improving construction artisans' job satisfaction in infrastructure provision, and by extension, the achievement of SDGs 3 and 8, is a key component of this study's originality/value. The findings of this study are also of great significance for construction stakeholders to optimise the suggested measures, enhancing artisans' well-being and economic growth through improved job satisfaction mechanisms among construction artisans.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ebekozien et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: