PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences5 citationsOpen Access

Social movements are transformative agents for biodiversity conservation

View Full Paper
MWMariana WalterASArnim ScheidelCVClara Vadez

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore the role of civil society movements in driving transformative change for biodiversity conservation.
  • Analyzed 2,801 socio-environmental mobilizations documented in the Environmental Justice Atlas.
  • Identified spatial, temporal, and sectoral patterns of these mobilizations.
  • Assessed the relationships between mobilizations and the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets.
  • Approximately 40% of mobilizations occur in high-priority conservation areas.
  • One-third of mobilizations faced repression or violence, particularly in critical regions.
  • Repressive mobilizations more frequently contest environmental threats related to biodiversity protection.

Abstract

Civil society has long been a catalyst for social change by reshaping structures, influencing values, and challenging power dynamics; however, its role in driving transformative change for biodiversity remains underexplored. To address this gap, we analyze 2,801 socio-environmental mobilizations documented in the Environmental Justice Atlas (EJAtlas). These mobilizations produce diverse outcomes that reveal distinct spatial, temporal, and sectoral patterns and proactively and reactively respond to environmental impacts across the globe. Notably, about 40% of these mobilizations occur within the top 30% of global priority lands for species conservation and their actions contribute to the achievement of key Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework targets focused on ecosystem protection, restoration, sustainable use, and inclusive spatial planning. Yet, one-third of mobilizations face repression, criminalization, or violence—pressures that are even more common in high-priority conservation areas. Moreover, mobilizations facing repressive outcomes contest environmental threats relevant for the KMGBF targets more extensively than those with progressive outcomes, underscoring the risks faced by movements driving biodiversity protection in critical regions. To amplify the transformative potential of socio-environmental mobilizations, we emphasize the importance of recognizing, strengthening, and protecting them through coordinated action among diverse social actors. By fostering collaboration and targeted resource allocation, these efforts can empower socio-environmental mobilizations to catalyze meaningful and lasting change for biodiversity conservation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Walter et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703af722626c4468e8b53https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2513327123
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper