Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Retrospective cohort study reviews postoperative motor deficits in 1000 patients, suggesting improved outcomes over time.
Study Design Retrospective cohort study. Objective To provide updated rates for approach-related postoperative motor deficits following lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) and identify risk factors. Methods 1000 stand-alone LLIF procedures between 2006 and 2024 were reviewed and divided into the first decade (2006-2015, n = 395) and the second decade (2016-2024, n = 605). Electronic records were screened for iliopsoas and quadriceps deficits preoperatively and postoperatively (at discharge, 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, and last follow-up) defined as a decline in MRC strength grades relative to baseline. Results The incidence of postoperative ≥1 MRC grade iliopsoas deficits declined from 12.7% to 4.1% and quadriceps deficits from 5.3% to 1.7% at 6 weeks ( P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). In the second decade, persistent iliopsoas or quadriceps weakness was observed in 0.8% and 0.5% (n = 3) of patients at 6 months and 1 year, respectively. At 2 years, only 1 of 605 patients had residual ≥1 MRC grade quadriceps weakness, and no patient had persistent iliopsoas weakness. Independent predictors of deficits were surgery at L4/5 (iliopsoas: OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1-4.5; quadriceps: OR 5.9, 95% CI 1.3-26.5) and operative time [per hour] (iliopsoas: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.2-1.6; quadriceps: OR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7). Conclusions Rates of postoperative motor deficits after standalone LLIF have improved significantly over the past decade. Increased surgical time and surgery at L4/5 remain key risk factors, but most deficits are transient. LLIF at L4/5 can be considered safe in appropriately selected patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Burkhard et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: