PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026Journal of Algebra and Its Applications0 citations

Multiplicity free induction for the pairs (GL 2 × GL 2 ,diag(GL 2 )) and (SL 3 ,GL 2 ) over finite fields

View Full Paper
EDElias DepuydtMPMaarten Van Pruijssen

Key Points

  • This research aims to classify irreducible representations of GL2(q) that lead to multiplicity free induction.
  • Classified irreducible representations of GL2(q) and their induction to GL2(q) × GL2(q).
  • Analyzed embedding of GL2(q) into SL3(q) and its effects on representations.
  • Compared results with holomorphic representation theory over complex numbers.
  • Only irreducible representations of dimensions 1 and q - 1 induce multiplicity free.
  • Embedding GL2(q) into SL3(q) does not yield multiplicity free representations.
  • Contrasts with multiplicity free outcomes in complex number contexts.

Abstract

We classify the irredible representations of GL 2(q) for which the induction to the product group GL 2(q) × GL2(q), under the diagonal embedding, decomposes multiplicity free. It turns out that only the irreducible representations of dimensions 1 and q − 1 have this property. We show that for GL 2(q) embedded into SL 3(q) via g → diag(g, det g −1 ) none of the irreducible representations of GL 2(q) induce multiplicity free. In contrast, over the complex numbers, the holomorphic representation theory of these pairs is multiplicity free and the corresponding matrix coefficients are encoded by vector-valued Jacobi polynomials. We show that similar results cannot be expected in the context of finite fields for these examples.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Depuydt et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703d3722626c4468e8cd9https://doi.org/10.1142/s0219498827501489
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper