PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 26, 2026Drug Testing and Analysis3 citations

A Multitarget Screening Method for the Detection of Small Peptides in Dried Blood Spots for Doping Control Analysis

View Full Paper
GBGaia BoschettiTLTobias LangerCMCLAUDIO MEDANA

Key Points

  • This research aims to develop a reliable method for identifying small peptides in dried blood spots for doping control.
  • Utilized dried blood spots (DBS) from both cellulose and polymeric supports.
  • Employed extraction with formic acid and acetate buffer.
  • Applied solid-phase extraction to purify extracts.
  • Conducted analysis using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography and high-resolution mass spectrometry.
  • Validated according to World Anti-Doping Agency regulations.
  • Successfully detected small peptides in both polymeric and cellulose DBS.
  • Achieved limits of detection in the low ng/mL range.
  • Demonstrated high selectivity and sensitivity for the screening method.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Over the past few years, dried blood spots (DBS) have been approved as a valid matrix for drug testing in sport. They undoubtedly offer advantages but also pose analytical challenges. For example, various DBS supports are nowadays available (polymeric and cellulose based) and an extraction method suitable for one support is not necessarily transferable to a different one. Herein, we present a qualitative screening method for the detection of a representative selection of small peptides and their metabolites in both cellulose and polymeric DBS. The analytes were extracted using an extraction solvent containing formic acid 1% in water/acetonitrile/methanol (70/15/15), followed by a second extraction with acetate buffer. To remove interferences and increase sensitivity, the combined extracts were further purified using solid‐phase extraction (mixed‐mode, weak cation exchange). Analysis was performed using ultrahigh‐performance liquid chromatography combined with high‐resolution mass spectrometry (orbitrap Q‐Exactive). The analysis time was 7.5 min, and the acquisition was performed in full‐scan mode, with the addition of some product ion scan acquisitions to increase selectivity or sensitivity for a few compounds that were particularly challenging. The method permits the analysis of small peptides on both polymeric and cellulose DBS samples with the same procedure for either matrix. Validation was performed following the World Anti‐Doping Agency regulations, and the method proved satisfactory in terms of selectivity and sensitivity (limits of detection in the low ng/mL range) and applicable to the analysis of sport samples for the detection of small peptides.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Boschetti et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/697703f6722626c4468e8eb3https://doi.org/10.1002/dta.70027
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Detection of doping substances in paired dried blood spots and urine samples collected during doping controls in Danish fitness centers2024 · 19 citations
  2. 2Sensitive Quantification of Igf-1 and its Synthetic Analogs in Dried Blood Spots2014 · 23 citations
  3. 3Sensitive determination of prohibited drugs in dried blood spots (DBS) for doping controls by means of a benchtop quadrupole/Orbitrap mass spectrometer2012 · 158 citations
  4. 4Metabolism of Growth Hormone Releasing Peptides2012 · 56 citations
  5. 5The sensitive detection of low molecular mass peptide drugs in dried blood spots by solid-phase extraction and LC-HRMS2024 · 4 citations