Key result
Sex and enabling factors link to PCCS utilization disparities despite ~90% having CVD family history.
Why the study?
CVD remains the leading cause of mortality in Saudi Arabia, making the evaluation of preventive cardiovascular clinical service utilization crucial to assess uptake and inform prevention strategies.
Cross-Sectional (n=384)
No
The utilization of preventive cardiovascular services in Saudi Arabia is heavily influenced by a complex mix of personal, structural, and contextual factors, highlighting the need for targeted interventions to improve access for high-risk groups.
Disparities in preventive service use by sex and enabling factors warrant attention; cross-sectional data leaves causal drivers and intervention targets open.
Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the leading cause of mortality in Saudi Arabia, mainly influenced by multiple lifestyle risk factors. Addressing this challenge requires a comprehensive evaluation of preventive services, particularly Preventive Cardiovascular Clinical Services (PCCS), which are essential for early detection and management. Hence, studying the utilization of PCCS is crucial to assess uptake and inform strategies to combat CVD burden. Methods A survey-based cross-sectional study was conducted at the largest primary healthcare center under the Armed Forces Healthcare Services (AFHS) in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. We surveyed 384 respondents to assess predisposing, enabling, and need factors that influence the utilization of nine PCCS using Andersen’s Behavioral Model of Health Services Use. Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models were employed to explore predictors of service utilization. Results The study revealed a notably high prevalence of both positive family history (90%) and self-reported diagnosis (53%) of CVD among participants, highlighting significant disparities in the utilization of PCCS across different service types and participant characteristics. Predisposing factors, including sex, age, parenthood, and educational attainment, consistently influenced the utilization of various PCCS. Sex-specific disparities were observed, with female individuals engaging in more PCCS, while gaps persisted in services such as smoking-cessation counseling. Personal and organizational enabling factors, including vehicle ownership and proximity to the nearest primary healthcare center, were crucial in facilitating access to healthcare. Finally, need factors, such as family history of CVD, the presence of CVD risk factors, and perceived health status, strongly influenced individuals’ motivations for seeking PCCS. Conclusion The complex intertwining of multiple personal, structural, and contextual factors further underscores the need to enhance PCCS user experience by designing, implementing, and monitoring targeted interventions, particularly for high-risk groups, based on their predisposing, enabling, and need profiles.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alamri et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular disease (n=384). Predisposing, enabling, and need factors was evaluated on Utilization of Preventive Cardiovascular Clinical Services (PCCS). Predisposing, enabling, and need factors significantly influenced preventive cardiovascular service utilization among respondents, of whom 90% had a family history and 53% a CVD diagnosis.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: