Comparative analysis reveals significant shifts towards decolonial pedagogies in Senegal, indicating broader implications for African Studies.
This comparative study examines the ongoing epistemic hegemony of Western-centric frameworks within African Studies curricula in Sub-Saharan higher education. It investigates the reconceptualisation of the discipline through an analysis of decolonial pedagogies in Senegal between 2021 and 2026. Employing a rigorous qualitative, multi-sited methodology, the research is based on a critical discourse analysis of curriculum documents, non-participant observations of pedagogical practice, and 42 semi-structured interviews with educators and students across three purposively selected Senegalese universities. The findings, derived from systematic thematic analysis, reveal a significant, though institutionally uneven, shift towards pedagogies that centre endogenous knowledge systems. This is evidenced by the deliberate integration of Wolof philosophical concepts such as *jom* (integrity) and *teranga* (hospitality), the adoption of oral history methodologies, and structured community-engaged learning. The study argues that these approaches collectively facilitate a critical epistemic displacement, directly challenging the coloniality of knowledge and fostering enhanced African intellectual agency. The research makes an empirical contribution by documenting and theorising a concrete praxis of decolonisation within continental academic institutions. It concludes that the Senegalese case provides a vital model for re-grounding African Studies in African socio-epistemic realities, offering concrete implications for curriculum reform and pedagogical innovation across the region.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Diagne et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: