Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates equivalent tumor growth inhibition by different T-cell types, indicating CD27-CD70 interactions are not critical for efficacy.
The CD27-CD70 pathway regulates T-cell activity either positively or negatively depending on the context of immune response. Typically, CD27 is known as a co-stimulatory receptor expressed on T cells while CD70 is the ligand expressed on antigen-presenting cells. Interestingly, CD70 is also expressed on T cells upon activation, raising an intriguing question about whether potential CD27-CD70 interaction within T cells affects T-cell response. To address this question in an antigen-specific adoptive T-cell model for tumor immunotherapy, we bred Pmel transgenic mice (JAX strain: 005023) with Cd70-/- mice to generate Pmel-Cd70-/- mice. We found that both CD27 and CD70 are expressed on Pmel T cells activated by GP100 antigen in vivo. Interestingly, T cells expressed CD27 protein at higher frequencies and higher levels in Pmel-Cd70-/- mice compared to Pmel mice with intact Cd70 gene, indicating CD27-CD70 reciprocal regulation. We inoculated Cd27-/-Cd70-/- mice with B16-F10 melanoma cells, then adoptively transferred Pmel versus Pmel-Cd70-/- T cells to compare their efficacy in controlling tumor growth. This unique system eliminates CD27-CD70–mediated interaction between host cells and adoptive T cells, allowing us to distinguish the impact of potential CD27-CD70 interaction within adoptive T cells. Our results showed that Pmel and Pmel-Cd70-/- T cells exhibited significant yet equivalent efficacy in inhibiting tumor growth, indicating that potential CD27-CD70 interaction within adoptive T cells does not affect T-cell immunotherapy in this tumor model. This work is informative for designing adoptive T-cell therapy for cancer treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Puppala et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: