Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This framework quantifies energy consumability in energy systems, indicating infrastructure limitations impact efficiency.
Modern energy systems are increasingly limited not by thermodynamics, but by infrastructure: network bottlenecks , load mismatches , control limitations , and temporal desynchronization between generation and consumption. Traditional exergy analysis only captures irreversibility but fails to explain why a significant portion of available energy cannot be consumed at all . This paper proposes the Energy Consumability Framework , a formalization of a new system parameter, the energy consumption coefficient . α, which quantifies the share of available energy physically achievable for use. A rigorous decomposition of α into network, load, management , and time factors is introduced , allowing for the separation of unreachable exergy (energy unavailable due to system limitations ) from destroyed exergy (thermodynamic losses). The framework demonstrates that infrastructure constraints can override thermodynamic constraints , and that increasing α often yields a greater impact than improving equipment efficiency . The approach is applicable to grids with a high share of renewable energy sources, storage systems , grid infrastructure planning , and investment evaluation . The work proposes a new order of analysis: Available Energy → Consumability → Exergy → Efficiency , which makes it a fundamental addition to classical exergetics.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zmiievskyi Oleg (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: