Objective: This review aimed to synthesize and critically appraise the existing evidence on endoscopic-assisted anterior odontoid screw fixation, with the objectives of clarifying its current clinical utility and identifying priorities for future optimization of the technique.Methods: A systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) guidelines and registered with PROSPERO (registration number: CRD420251251051). Searches of PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar identified studies reporting the use of endoscopic visualization during anterior odontoid screw placement. Eligible study designs included clinical reports and cadaveric investigations. Extracted data encompassed patient demographics, fracture subtype, operative technique, radiological alignment, fusion status, perioperative complications, and risk of bias, which was assessed using the modified Joanna Briggs Institute checklist.Results: Eight studies met the inclusion criteria, comprising 6 clinical reports and 2 cadaveric feasibility studies. The extent of endoscopic assistance ranged from hybrid mini-open approaches to fully endoscopic uniportal techniques. Reported fusion rates ranged from 80% to 100%, with fully endoscopic procedures demonstrating the most consistent radiological consolidation and anatomical reduction. No major neurovascular, aerodigestive, or implant-related complications were reported. Cadaveric evidence confirmed enhanced visualization of the C2 odontoid entry point and validated safe screw entry-point orientation with acceptable screw trajectories. Risk-of-bias assessment indicated low risk in 5 studies and moderate risk in 3. Small sample sizes, heterogeneous fracture morphology, and modest follow-up durations limited the overall quality of the evidence.Conclusion: Endoscopic-assisted anterior odontoid screw fixation appears to be a technically feasible and biologically favorable minimally invasive option for selected odontoid fractures. Its potential advantages include improved visualization and reduced approach-related morbidity. Further prospective, multicenter investigations, particularly those integrating navigation systems, are required to define its definitive role in the management of cervical spine trauma.
Liawrungrueang et al. (Fri,) studied this question.