Key result
GOAT-R score predicts poor short-term stroke outcomes with a c-statistic of 0.75.
Why the study?
An accurate and easy-to-use predictive tool was needed to forecast short-term functional outcomes for ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis in rural settings.
Does the GOAT-R score accurately predict poor 30-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolytics?
Does the GOAT-R score accurately predict poor 30-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with intravenous thrombolytics?
The GOAT-R score provides an accurate and simple tool to predict poor 30-day functional outcomes in acute ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolytics, particularly useful for guiding early conversations in rural settings.
May facilitate early counseling in rural thrombolysis; leaves open prospective validation before adoption.
Objective: To develop a predictive tool that is accurate and easy to use for short-term functional outcomes for ischemic stroke patients treated with thrombolysis in the rural setting. Methods: This multicenter retrospective study utilized an Integrated Health System Rural Stroke Network Registry as a derivation cohort and a large urban academic hospital with a Comprehensive Stroke Center designation database as a validation cohort. Demographics, clinical, laboratory, and radiographic data were collected. A poor short-term outcome was defined as a 30-day mRS score of 5 or higher. A backward logistic regression analysis was developed based on the clinical significance of the dependent variables, and a 5-point predictive score system (GOAT-R) was developed based on clinical plausibility and practicality. A calibration curve was designed. The score was tested on the validation cohort. P-value was set at 0.05 for all statistical analyses. Results: Of 222 patients included in the derivation cohort, 35 (16%) had a poor short-term outcome. In a backward logistic regression model, baseline mRS (OR:1.511, 95% CI:1.047-2.182, p=0.02), and NIHSS (OR:1.136, 95% CI:1.063-1.214, p<0.01) were independently associated with poor short-term outcome. Age also showed a strong trend toward significance (OR: 1.045, 95% CI: 0.995-1.093, p = 0.05). Additional variables were re-entered in the final predictive model based on clinical plausibility and practicality. The 5-point predictive score GOAT-R was then created, adding one point for each of the following variables: age > 75, cardiac disease, baseline mRS > 2, NIHSS ≥ 20, and GFR < 40. The c-statistic of the model was 0.79, 95% CI: 0.71 – 0.87. In the validation cohort of 200 patients, the model performed with a c-statistic of 0.75, 95% CI: 0.64 – 0.86. Conclusions: The GOAT-R score is an accurate and easy-to-use aiding tool to help providers in rural settings guide early conversations with stroke patients and their families. Providing rural settings with inexpensive and accurate prognostic tools is a crucial step in bridging the gap in stroke care between urban and rural areas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robayo et al. (2026) studied this question. The GOAT-R score, which includes age, cardiac disease, baseline mRS, NIHSS, and GFR, predicted poor outcomes in stroke patients with a c-statistic of 0.75 in validation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: