In-vitro study compares robotic arm and dynamic navigation accuracy in mandibular implants, indicating varied implications for practice.
D-CAIS demonstrated higher accuracy in mandibular implant placement, particularly in terms of linear deviations, while R-CAIS showed greater consistency in angular measurements despite no significant difference between groups. Overall, the observed deviations were small and are of limited clinical significance. These findings reflect system-level performance in a controlled laboratory setting, further clinical studies are required to validate these results in vivo.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
AL-Meshary et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: