Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
A double-blind, randomized trial evaluates JNJ-42165279's effects on depression and anxiety symptoms, showing no significant benefits compared to placebo.
JNJ-42165279 is a potent, selective inhibitor of fatty acid amide hydrolase (FAAH), the enzyme responsible for degradation of the endocannabinoid N-arachidonoylethanolamide (anandamide), which plays a role in regulation of fear and anxiety responses. This double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 2a study assessed the efficacy, safety and pharmacodynamics of adjunctive treatment with JNJ-42165279 in participants with major depressive disorder (MDD) with anxious distress and inadequate response to selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRI) or serotonergic/noradrenergic reuptake inhibitors (SNRI). Eligible participants (18-64 years; N = 153) were randomised (1:1) to receive JNJ-42165279 (25 mg) or placebo orally once daily and were maintained on their current SSRI/SNRI treatment. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline at week 6 in the 17-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS₁₇). The study results did not show a significant treatment effect of adjunctive JNJ-42165279 on the primary endpoint versus placebo (least square mean difference [standard error]: -0.2 [1.04]; one-sided p=0.416) in the enriched intent-to-treat population. Findings for the key secondary efficacy endpoints also did not demonstrate an additional benefit of adjunctive JNJ-42165279 treatment over placebo. Treatment with JNJ-42165279 produced substantial increases in the mean concentrations of fatty acid amides in plasma, and the plasma JNJ-42165279 and anandamide levels were strongly correlated. The safety results were consistent with the known safety profile of JNJ-42165279. Overall, adjunctive treatment with JNJ-42165279 at the dose tested did not provide significant benefit in reducing depression/anxiety symptoms versus placebo but showed no new safety signals in participants with MDD and anxious distress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Schmidt et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: