Key result
Coronary radiomics machine learning automates patient-level CAD-RADS scoring with ~77% balanced accuracy.
Observational (n=238)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Demonstrates enhanced CAD-RADS scoring through radiomic features in patients, suggesting improved automated classification methods.
Synthesizing coronary radiomic data to obtain a single patient-wise Coronary Artery Disease-Reporting and Data System (CAD-RADS) score remains challenging. This work proposes four strategies for summarizing radiomic features extracted from 2779 multiplanar reconstruction images derived from coronary computed tomography angiography of 238 patients. A cascade pipeline was developed to train gradient boosting classifiers for CAD-RADS scoring through consecutive tasks, considering 80%-20% training/test split with five-fold cross-validation on the training set. Two statistical-based and two majority voting approaches were implemented to obtain patient-level classification. The former consisted in computing features average, minimum, maximum and standard deviation, across the coronary images, leading to intermediate coronary classification, followed by patient classification according to the worst coronary class. The latter consisted in single image predictions and the application of majority voting either to all the images, to obtain patient classification (MV_P), or to the images of single coronary arteries, followed by patient classification according to the worst coronary class (MV_C). Majority-voting approaches outperformed statistical-based ones, with MV_P achieving an AUC of CAD-RADS_0 = 0.94, CAD-RADS_1 = 0.92, CAD-RADS_2 = 0.97, CAD-RADS_3 = 0.77, CAD-RADS_4 = 0.88, CAD-RADS_5 = 0.85, and MV_C of CAD-RADS_0 = 0.82, CAD-RADS_1 = 0.78, CAD-RADS_2 = 0.84, CAD-RADS_3 = 0.96, CAD-RADS_4 = 0.98 and CAD-RADS_5 = 0.85. This study represents a significant advancement toward robust and reproducible coronary radiomics tools for automated CAD-RADS scoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Corti et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Coronary artery disease (n=238). Majority voting machine learning from coronary radiomic features (MV_P) vs. Statistical-based feature summarization (Av_C, Stat_C) and MV_C was evaluated on Patient-level CAD-RADS classification (Balanced accuracy 0.77, 95% CI 0.75-0.78). A majority-voting machine learning approach using coronary radiomic features successfully automated patient-level CAD-RADS scoring with a balanced accuracy of 0.77 and high class-specific AUCs.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: