ABSTRACT Background Many Parkinson's disease patients receiving oral levodopa/carbidopa experience a troublesome wearing off effect. Higher doses to mitigate OFF‐time are limited by adverse effects occurring at peak dopamine levels, particularly dyskinesia. A novel strategy to reduce OFF‐time without increasing peak dopamine levels is the continuous subcutaneous infusion of levodopa/carbidopa, or their prodrug equivalents foslevodopa/foscarbidopa. Objectives Assess whether subcutaneous infusion therapies safely reduce OFF‐time and improve quality of life scores compared to oral levodopa/carbidopa. Methods We searched MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL and ICTRP up to 28th October 2024 for clinical trials comparing subcutaneous infusions of levodopa or foslevodopa to oral levodopa in Parkinson's disease. Results Screening of 1114 records identified seven studies in which 725 patients received subcutaneous infusion regimens of levodopa/carbidopa (ND0612) (407 patients) or foslevodopa/foscarbidopa (318 patients). Moderate quality evidence indicated subcutaneous infusion reduced the daily duration of OFF‐time by 1.98 h ( p = 0.0004). Moderate quality evidence indicated improvements in health‐related quality of life score PDQ‐39 ( p = 0.0003) and sleep score PDSS‐2 ( p = 0.02), but an increase in the rate of treatment‐emergent adverse events, mostly related to the infusion site ( p = 0.04). Conclusions Subcutaneous infusion therapies produce a clinically and statistically significant reduction in the duration of OFF‐time experienced by patients with Parkinson's disease, compared to oral levodopa/carbidopa. Patient experience is improved by a statistically, but not clinically, significant degree. There are increased adverse events, mostly related to the infusion site. Overall, subcutaneous infusion regimens could provide a meaningful alternative for Parkinson's disease patients who experience severe motor fluctuations with existing levodopa formulations.
Burton et al. (2026) studied this question.