PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Stroke0 citations

Abstract DP004: Improvements in Biological Age Acceleration Lead to Better Neuroimaging, Clinical, and Cognitive Markers of Brain Health

View Full Paper
CRCyprien RivierSHShufan HuoSCSantiago Clocchiatti-Tuozzo

Key Result

Higher baseline biological age acceleration increased incident stroke risk (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.38-1.45), while improving it reduced stroke risk (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.97) over 10 years.

Key Points

  • The research investigates how improvements in biological age acceleration (BAA) impact MRI markers, cognitive function, and stroke risk.
  • Utilized KDmAge, a biological age measure from 18 blood biomarkers, in a large sample of UK Biobank participants.
  • Assessed biological age acceleration at baseline and its changes over time.
  • Evaluated outcomes including MRI profiles, cognitive performance, and stroke events over a median 10-year follow-up.
  • Applied multivariable linear models for MRI and cognition, and Cox proportional hazards models for stroke.
  • Higher BAA at baseline correlated with poorer MRI profiles, worse cognitive performance, and increased stroke risk.
  • Improvements in BAA led to better MRI profiles, including reductions in white matter hyperintensity and ventricular volume.
  • Decreased risk of any stroke and ischemic stroke associated with improvements in BAA.

Study Design

Type

Cohort (n=258,169)

Structured PICO

Is biological age acceleration and its improvement associated with incident stroke, cognitive performance, and MRI markers of brain health?

P
Population
258,169 UK Biobank participants (mean age 56, 53% female) followed for a median of 10 years to evaluate the impact of biological age acceleration on brain health.
E
Exposure
Baseline Biological Age Acceleration (BAA) and annualized change in BAA (ΔBAA/yr) derived from KDmAge (18 routine blood biomarkers)
O
Outcome
Incident stroke and ischemic stroke over a median 10-year follow-up, MRI markers of small vessel disease at T2, and cognitive performance at T2hard clinical

Improvements in biological age acceleration are associated with a lower risk of future stroke and better brain MRI profiles, suggesting biological aging is a modifiable target for brain health.

Main Result

Hazard Ratio: 0.77 (95% CI 0.61–0.97)

Limitations

  • Limited power for cognitive outcomes after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors

Abstract

Background: Biological age acceleration (BAA), the discrepancy between chronological and biological age, captures multisystem aging and is associated with adverse neurological outcomes. Whether improving BAA leads to future brain health benefits remains unknown. Hypothesis: We tested whether baseline (T0) BAA and changes in BAA from baseline (T0) to the repeat visit (T1) are associated with subsequent (T2) MRI markers of small vessel disease, cognitive performance, and incident stroke (Figure 1). Methods: KDmAge, a biological age measure built from 18 routine blood biomarkers with externally calibrated weights, was derived at baseline (T0) for 258,169 UK Biobank participants (mean age 56, mean KDmAge 54, 53% female) and at the repeat visit (T1) for 6,085 participants (mean age 62, mean KDmAge 58, 50% female). BAA was obtained by residualizing KDmAge on age (3-df splines) and sex. Exposures were baseline BAA and annualized change (ΔBAA/yr). Outcomes were: (i) MRI markers at T2; (ii) cognitive performance at T2; and (iii) incident stroke and ischemic stroke over a median 10-year follow-up. Multivariable linear models were used for MRI and cognition, and Cox proportional hazards models for stroke events. Results: Higher BAA at T0 was associated with poorer MRI profiles at T2 (Figure 2), worse cognition (Figure 3), and higher risk of incident stroke (HR per 1 SD increase: 1.41, 95%CI: 1.38-1.45). Improving BAA between T0 and T1 was associated with more favorable MRI profiles at T2: lower white matter hyperintensity volume, better white-matter diffusion metrics, and smaller ventricular volume. ΔBAA was also associated with reduced risk of any stroke (HR per SD: 0.77 0.61-0.97) and ischemic stroke (HR: 0.73 0.56-0.96). Associations with fluid intelligence, pattern completion, trail completion, and reaction time at T2 were observed but confidence intervals crossed 0 after adjustment for cardiovascular risk factors, likely reflecting limited power. Conclusions: BAA and improvement in BAA are associated with lower subsequent risk of stroke and improvements in MRI markers of small vessel disease years later, independent of socioeconomic and vascular risk factors. Evidence for cognitive benefits is suggestive but less certain after adjustment. Taken together, these findings support targeting biological aging as a modifiable pathway to preserve brain health and motivate trials testing whether lowering BAA reduces later-life brain injury and disease.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Rivier et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Brain health (n=258,169). Improvement in biological age acceleration (ΔBAA/yr) was evaluated on incident stroke (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.61-0.97). Higher baseline biological age acceleration increased incident stroke risk (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.38-1.45), while improving it reduced stroke risk (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.61-0.97) over 10 years.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd18c1c9540dea80edefhttps://doi.org/10.1161/str.57.suppl_1.dp004
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper