PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
February 2, 2026Cancer Medicine5 citationsOpen Access

Bispecific Antibodies Versus Chimeric Antigen Receptor T‐Cell Therapy in Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B‐Cell Lymphoma: A Comparative Narrative Review of Efficacy, Safety, and Accessibility

View Full Paper
DADana Sofian AbouHTHusna Irfan ThalibFAFayza Akil

Key Points

  • This review aims to compare bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in the context of relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma.
  • Narrative review comparing therapies across mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, and safety profiles.
  • Assessment of logistics and cost-effectiveness of both therapies.
  • Evaluation of accessibility and treatment options for patients.
  • CAR T therapies show durable complete response rates of 40%-60% and a median progression-free survival of 11-12.5 months.
  • CAR T therapies are hampered by high costs and complex manufacturing processes.
  • Bispecific antibodies provide immediate availability and favorable safety profiles for outpatient use, although long-term efficacy is still being studied.

Abstract

ABSTRACT Introduction Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common subtype of non‐Hodgkin lymphoma, and despite advances in frontline therapies such as rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride (hydroxydaunorubicin), vincristine sulfate (Oncovin), and prednisone, approximately 30%–40% of patients develop relapsed or refractory (rel/ref) disease. This subgroup has historically faced poor prognoses with limited treatment options, prompting the development of novel immunotherapeutic strategies. Chimeric antigen receptor T‐cell (CAR T) therapy and bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) have emerged as transformative approaches in this setting. Methods This narrative review compares these therapies across multiple domains, including mechanisms of action, clinical efficacy, safety profiles, logistics, cost, and accessibility. Results CAR T therapies have demonstrated durable complete response rates (40%–60%) and extended progression‐free survival (median 11–12.5 months), but they are limited by complex manufacturing, high cost, and potentially severe toxicities. In contrast, BsAbs offer immediate, off‐the‐shelf availability, with promising efficacy and a more favorable safety profile that enables outpatient administration, although long‐term durability remains under investigation. Conclusion This review provides clinicians with a comprehensive comparison to support evidence‐based treatment selection in rel/ref DLBCL.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Abou et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6980fd3cc1c9540dea80f07bhttps://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.71562
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The Great Debate: CAR-T-Cell Therapy Versus Bispecific Antibodies in B-Cell Lymphoma2026
  2. 2Efficacy and safety of CAR-T cell therapy versus bispecific antibodies in patients with relapsed/refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma: A single-arm meta-analysis2025
  3. 3Effectiveness and safety of bispecific antibodies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL): A systematic review and meta-analysis2025
  4. 4A Review of Bispecific Antibody Therapy for Relapsed/Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma and Implementation in a Community Hospital2026 · 1 citations
  5. 5Real-world comparative outcomes of CAR-T cell therapy versus bispecific antibodies in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma2025